Content · Report
AI Post Grader: Review Social Posts Before Publishing
Use an AI post grader to review clarity, evidence, brand voice, and the next action. See an example review and Agency Script’s member guide.
Agency Script Editorial · Updated
The problem to solve
A post can sound polished while making a promise the business cannot support. A useful review looks at what the reader will understand and believe, then makes specific edits.
Review meaning before polish
Ask what the first sentence promises and whether the body delivers it. Check that claims have supporting evidence and that the next action matches the reader’s stage. An exaggerated opening is not fixed by a more elegant closing line. Keep the reviewer’s attention on the few changes that materially improve the post.
Make revision status explicit
Separate a copy edit from a missing fact. The former can be corrected immediately; the latter needs an answer from the business. When evidence is missing, revise the claim or hold the draft instead of assigning it a reassuring score. A final review should make it easy to see what changed and what still needs a person’s decision.
Turn feedback into a complete revision handoff
For an Agency Script workflow, connect the review to the approved brand brief and the purpose of the original draft. Keep the revised text, the reason for each meaningful change, and any unresolved evidence request together. The next person should be able to decide whether the post is ready without reconstructing the conversation. Once published through an authorized workflow, bring actual performance observations into the next review. Record the channel, audience, and timing so one successful post does not become an unsupported universal rule.
How Agency Script helps
Agency Script’s post review skill helps turn vague feedback into an actionable revision pass. It can follow the writing stage so the draft and its original goal stay connected.
Start with a short request and your source material. The paid guide includes the copyable starter, what to provide, and how to review the result on web or desktop.
Open the member instructionsWhat to bring
- Draft post and target channel
- Audience, goal, and approved voice examples
- Evidence for claims and intended next action
What a useful result includes
- Specific issues tied to draft passages
- Suggested revisions with reasons
- Unresolved evidence requests
- A clear review status
Worked example · Report
Review notes for a consulting post
Fictional draft review. These notes demonstrate the output shape, not a published campaign result.
Illustrative worked example created for this guide. Fictional business and inputs; not a customer result or a verified product execution.
| Draft issue | Proposed change | Status |
|---|---|---|
| “Every team saves ten hours” has no source. | Remove the universal claim; describe the observed workflow. | Needs author confirmation. |
| The opening names three separate problems. | Lead with one handoff problem. | Ready to revise. |
| The final link does not match the topic. | Link to the handoff example mentioned in the post. | Check destination before publishing. |
What to verify before using the result
- Review is not a prediction of virality or conversion.
- The publisher remains responsible for factual claims and final approval.
Put your own inputs to work
Members can open the starter guide, supply their context, and review the result. New to Agency Script? Explore the product and plans.